新闻中心

当前位置 > 新闻中心> 电脑办公 > CPU

请回答1988

Is the rapid growth of China’s emerging industries driven by industrial subsidies?: People’s Daily_我的网站

steam

A |       讯 8月26日,国务院新闻办公室举行“开局起步‘十五五’”系列主题新闻发布会,介绍全力抓好“十五五”规划实施,加快推进新型工业化有关情况。    

Workers assemble solar photovoltaic modules at a smart manufacturing workshop of Ronma Solar Energy Group in Jindong district of Jinhua city, East China's Zhejiang Province, on July 28, 2026. Photo: VCG
    Workers assemble solar photovoltaic modules at a smart manufacturing workshop of Ronma Solar Energy Group in Jindong district of Jinhua city, East China's Zhejiang Province, on July 28, 2026. Photo: VCG
China saw robust exports in electric vehicles (EV), lithium batteries and photovoltaic products, known as the "new three," in the first half of this year. More notably, robotics, artificial intelligence (AI) and innovative drugs, which represent the future direction of industrial development, are also emerging as new calling cards for China's foreign trade.
However, the impressive performance provoked unease among some Western media outlets and politicians. Some have deliberately portrayed China's rapid industrial development and strong competitiveness as a result of government subsidies, pushing the false claim that subsidies have created overcapacity and those low-priced Chinese products are flooding global markets. Such fallacies, which simply equate industrial subsidies with overcapacity, are not only logically flawed but also factually groundless.
In practice, many countries adopt industrial policies tailored to their national conditions and development needs, such as providing research and development (R&D) subsidies for emerging industries and risk related subsidies for agriculture.
Well-designed industrial subsidies can help address market failures, promote technological innovation and environmental protection, reduce poverty and support balanced development, rather than cause so called "overcapacity."
Multiple reports by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development have noted that the number of industrial policies worldwide has grown rapidly over the past five years, with R&D subsidies, tax incentives and low interest loans for emerging industries becoming common international practices.
Forcibly linking industrial subsidies to "overcapacity" is, in essence, a political manipulation based on double standards. The US, for example, plans to provide $750 billion in various subsidies from 2022 to 2031 under its Inflation Reduction Act. Subsidized EVs are subject to requirements such as production and sales in the US or North America, effectively excluding other WTO members. US industrial subsidies for AI are even greater than those of all other countries combined.
Similarly, according to incomplete statistics, the European Commission is expected to provide more than 1.44 trillion euros ($210 billion) in various subsidies between 2021 and 2030. The EU's Industrial Accelerator Act links local content directly to financial support through "Made in EU" requirements, creating serious investment barriers and institutional discrimination.
Have these massive subsidies been labeled as causing "overcapacity"? The answer is no. While claiming that China's industrial subsidies lead to so-called overcapacity, these countries are themselves providing massive subsidies to their own industries. Such double standards amount to selective accusations targeting China, aimed at politicizing trade and economic issues and weaponizing industrial policy.
At a deeper level, accusations that "China's industrial subsidies cause overcapacity" are merely a pretext, reflecting growing anxiety and fear over the rising competitiveness of Chinese industries.
Looking back at the repeated hype in Western media, the criticism has consistently targeted China's most globally competitive industries, including new-energy vehicles, photovoltaics and power batteries. This exposes the real intention of shifting the blame for their own lagging industrial development onto China while stepping up restrictions against Chinese industries.
China's breakthroughs in these industries have been driven by advances in homegrown technologies, complete industrial and supply chains, and robust market competition, rather than by policy subsidies as some have claimed.
In recent years, China has taken multiple steps to regulate and improve its subsidy policies, from reviewing and correcting inappropriate local subsidies to exploring a unified negative list mechanism for local fiscal subsidies. China applies subsidies equally to all market entities, including foreign invested enterprises, strictly follows WTO rules, and continues to improve the compliance, effectiveness and transparency of its subsidy policies.
Rather than fabricating and hyping baseless claims about subsidies and obsessing over building trade barriers, certain Western media outlets and politicians should focus on addressing their own weaknesses and increasing investment in research and development. They should embrace healthy market competition with an inclusive mindset, promote mutual benefit through greater openness, and win markets and drive progress through genuine innovation.
This was compiled and translated by the Global Times English edition based on an article published in the "Chisu Jinsheng" economic commentary column of the People's Daily on August 10, 2026.
。  工业和信息化部规划司司长姚珺在会上介绍,新兴产业是引领产业升级发展的新动能、新引擎。将深入贯彻落实“十五五”规划《纲要》部署,实施发展壮大工业新兴产业打造新动能行动,多措并举加快新兴产业规模化发展,提升产业全球竞争力,打造一批新兴支柱产业。

B |   抓好技术攻关,推动新兴领域创新成果加速突破。纵深推进重大技术装备攻关和产业基础再造工程的实施,聚焦战略领域和产业链供应链薄弱环节,补短板、锻长板、强基础,采取超常规措施,全链条推动集成电路、工业母机、高端仪器仪表、基础软件和工业软件、先进材料、生物制造等重点领域关键核心技术攻关取得决定性突破。优化制造业创新中心、中试基地等平台布局,补齐关键共性技术供给短板。

C |   抓好载体建设,推动新兴产业重点园区和企业加速壮大。创建国家新兴产业发展示范基地,聚焦新一代信息技术、新能源、新材料、智能网联新能源汽车、机器人、生物医药、高端装备、航空航天等新兴产业重点领域,打造一批引领新兴产业发展的标杆。到2035年,将力争培育100家左右在产业集群发展、协同创新、生态优化、治理提升等方面具有辐射带动作用的示范园区,1000家左右在产品开发、技术创新、业态创新、管理效能等方面处于领先水平的示范企业。  抓好场景培育,推动新技术新产品新场景大规模应用加速成势。开展制造业新技术新产品新场景大规模应用示范,加快培育“5G+”“人工智能+”“机器人+”“工业互联网+”“北斗+”等重大应用场景,完善标志性项目遴选、新技术新产品新场景清单发布、供需对接等机制,一体推进创新成果在真实场景中进行测试验证和迭代升级,推动相关领域产业化落地和大规模应用。

D |   抓好生态优化,推动要素资源向新兴产业加速集聚。深入推进新产业标准化领航工程,实施“科技产业金融一体化”专项,建设国家卓越工程师实践基地,创新发展服务型制造和生产性服务业,加快健全与新兴产业发展相适应的标准、金融、人才等服务保障体系。实施大中小企业数字化协同转型试点、制造业卓越质量提升工程,支持龙头企业联合上下游组建创新联合体,促进大中小企业融通发展、产业链上下游协同创新。版权申明:凡注有“”或电头为“”的稿件,均为独家版权所有,未经许可不得转载或镜像;授权转载必须注明来源为“”,并保留“”的电头。

E |     。

Current article:http://www.rangzhuanhoujuedu.cyou/gprs2hm/groxlr.htm

Published on:22:16:57


文章观点支持

文章价值打分
当前文章打分0 分,共有0人打分
热门评论
热门文章